Submit a preprint

82

A soft tick vector of *Babesia* sp. YLG in Yellow-legged gull (*Larus michahellis*) nestsuse asterix (*) to get italics
Claire Bonsergent, Marion Vittecoq, Carole Leray, Maggy Jouglin, Marie Buysse, Karen D. McCoy, Laurence MalandrinPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2023
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Babesia </em>sp. YLG has recently been described in Yellow-legged gull (<em>Larus michahellis</em>) chicks and belongs to the Peircei clade in the new classification of Piroplasms. Here, we studied <em>Babesia </em>sp. YLG vectorial transmission by ticks in the simplified environment of a single seabird breeding colony where the Yellow-legged gull is the sole vertebrate host, <em>Ornithodoros maritimus</em> (syn. <em>Alectorobius maritimus</em>) the sole tick species, and <em>Babesia </em>sp. YLG is the only blood parasite species detected in chicks of the colony. We collected ticks over four years, maintained certain individuals through moulting or oviposition, and dissected fresh ticks to isolate different organs and test for the presence of the parasite using molecular assays. We report the first strong evidence of a Piroplasmidae transmitted by a soft tick. Indeed, <em>Babesia</em> sp. YLG DNA was detected in the salivary glands of nymphs, females and males, a necessary organ to infect for transmission to a new vertebrate host. Parasite DNA was also found in tick ovaries, which could indicate possible transovarial transmission. Our detection of <em>Babesia </em>sp. YLG DNA in several male testes and in endospermatophores, and notably in a parasite-free female (uninfected ovaries and salivary glands), raise the interesting possibility of sexual transmission from infected males to uninfected females. Future work in this system will now need to focus on the degree to which the parasite can be maintained locally by ticks and the epidemiological consequences of infection for both <em>O. maritimus</em> and its avian host.</p>
https://doi.org/10.57745/XSSMO1You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
Argasidae, colonial seabirds, blood parasites, Ornithodoros maritimus, Piroplasmidae, transmission ecology
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Ecology of hosts, infectious agents, or vectors, Eukaryotic pathogens/symbionts, Interactions between hosts and infectious agents/vectors, Parasites, Vectors
Merino Santiago [santiagom@mncn.csic.es], Yabsley MJ [myabsley@uga.edu], Parsons NJ [nolaparsons@yahoo.co.uk], Vanstreels RET [ralph_vanstreels@yahoo.com.br], Raffel SJ [sstewart@nih.gov], Hornok S [hornok.sandor@univet.hu], Franscisco Valera [pvalera@eeza.csic.es], Andrea Paparini [A.Paparini@murdoch.edu.au], Peter J Irwin [p.irwin@murdoch.edu.au], Tom Schwan [tschwan@nih.gov]
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
No need for them to be recommenders of PCIInfections. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
2023-03-29 14:33:40
Thomas Pollet